The petitioner complained that he was arrested on 27.06.2007 around 11.30 a.m. while he was on his way to attend a funeral in the Neluketiya area and that at the time he was arrested the,1st respondent had assaulted him. The petitioner accordingly alleged that due to the aforementioned action his fundamental rights guaranteed in terms of Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Constitution had been infringed for which this Court had granted leave to proceed. Although leave to proceed was granted on Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the…
Read MoreTag: slcat
Bandula Samarasekera, vs Vijitha Alwis, Officer-in-Charge, Chief Inspector Dehigama, Officer-in-Charge S.C. (FR) Application No. 107/2007,
The petitioner had been an employee at Brown and Company from 1979 – 1996 and thereafter was engaged in facilitating sales of vehicles. His wife is a retired teacher in English who was the Head of the English Division of the Advanced Technical Institute, Kandy. Their son Sahan, was 24 years of age at the time of this incident and was engaged in a mobile phone shop in Kandy. In 2005, the petitioner and his wife had learnt that Sahan was having an affair with a married woman. In the…
Read Moreදිනේශ් තරින්ද වදහිංසා නඩුව 2303/2007
2004.06.01 හා 2004.06.03 වන දින අතර කාලය තුල දී මොහුට චූදිත හර්ෂණ තිලංග ගුණසිංහ යන අය තොරතුරු දැනගැනීමට බියගන්වා වද දුන් බැවින් 1994 අංක 22 දරණ සම්මුතියේ වගන්ති අනුව මොහු වරදක් සිදුකර ඇත. ඒ අනුව මෙම දිනේශ් තරින්ද යන යන අයව අත්තඩංගුවට ගෙන මාංචු දමා විනාඩි 45ක් පමණ පහර දී ඇත. ඒ අවස්තාවේ දී ඔහුට ක්‍රිකට් පොලු වලින්ද පහර දී ඇත. එමෙන්ම ඔහුට පා පහරවල් ද එල්ල කර ඇතම් මෙම පහර දීම් නිසා ඔහුගේ අත කැඩුණු බව ද පවසයි. නමුත් මෙම චෝදනා සියල්ලෙහිම සාක්ෂි සලකා බැලීමේ දී සාධාරණ සැකයෙන් ඔබ්බට…
Read MoreFAROOK VS DHARMARATNE, CHAIRMAN, PROVINCIAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UVA AND OTHERS | 2005 1SLR 133
The petitioner who was in Grade l-l of the Sri Lanka Principals’ Service was not eligible to apply for the post of Principal of Sir Razick Fareed Maha Vidyaiaya. Flowever, with the support of the Provincial Chief Minister of the Uva Province, he first became Principal of Liyanagahawela Tamil Vidyaiaya for which he was not eligible and thereafter by deceit and with the support of the Provincial Ministry of Education he obtained an appointment as Principal of Razick Fareed Maha Vidyaiaya. When the 05th respondent the Provincial Director of Education,…
Read MoreSRIYANI SILVA v IDDAMALGODA, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, POLICE STATION PAIYAGALA AND OTHERS | 2003 2SLR 63
The petitioner is the widow of an army deserter (deceased) against whom there was also an open warrant signed by the Magistrate for possession of illicit liquor and distilling equipment. On 12.06.2000 the 2nd respondent OIC (Crimes) Paiyagala Police Station, arrested the deserter and took him to the police station where he was detained until the 17th. The petitioner and deceased’s mother and sister stated that they visited the deceased on 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th and observed the deceased being assaulted and with serious injuries. The deceased also told…
Read MoreSARJUN v KAMALDEEN AND TWO OTHERS SC FR 559/03
The petitioner and 3 others were transporting household furniture in their lorry, from Colombo to Katuwana. As they reached Habarana at night, he decided to spend the night at Habarana and parked the lorry on the side of the road. The petitioner had a permit to transport obtained under the Forest Ordinance, although a permit was not necessary.The petitioner claims that he obtained same out of an abundance of caution valid from 1 p.m. on 18.9.03 to 12 noon 19.9.03. Later in the night the 1st respondent came up to…
Read MoreSIRIMAL AND OTHERS v BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENT AND OTHERS | 2003 2SLR 23
The petitioners complained that the 1st respondent (‘The CWE”) did in violation of their rights under Article 12(1) of the Constitution stopped extension of their services beyond 55 years and purported to retire them from 31.7.2002, by circular dated 21.6.2002(P6). The previous circular dated 14.11.1995(P5) provided for granting of annual extension from 55 until 60 as in the case of the public sector under Chapter V section 5 of the Establishments Code. The reasons given for the new policy decision were: (a) Redundant labour force (b) Heavy losses; and (c)…
Read MoreADHIKARY AND ANOTHER v AMARASINGHE AND OTHERS | 2003 1SLR 270
The 1 st petitioner an attorney-at-law was proceeding in his car from Nawala to the Bandaranaike International Conference Hall (BMICH) with his wife the 2nd petitioner and his child and the mother to attend an exhibition. At Narahenpita there was traffic block. When the vehicles started moving the 1st and 2nd respondents came up to petitioner’s car and pulled the petitioner out and abused him and stopped him. When the 2nd petitioner intervened they abused her also and slapped her. When the 1st petitioner disclosed that he was an attorney-at-law…
Read MoreVELU ARASADEVI V PREMATILAKA AND OTHERS S C F R 4 0 1 /2 0 0 1
T h e p e titio n er w a s s to p p e d at a c h e c k poin t a n d a llo w e d to g o h o m e . Later r e s p o n d e n ts (P o lic e/A rm y O fficers) h a d c o m e h o m e a n d o r d er e d h er to a c c o m p…
Read MoreWICKREMASINGIfE c . v – CEYLON PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND OTHERS |2001 2SLR 409
The petitioner had been a dealer in petroleum products from 1949 at premises No. 267 Galle Road, Colombo 4 when the said premises were with the British owned Shell Company until the same vested with the 1 * respondent Corporation in 1964 under the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation Act after which the business was continued on an Agreement with the Corporation. The Agreement of Dealership could be terminated either without notice on the ground of defaults on the part o f the dealer or by either party giving 3 months notice…
Read More