The petitioner complained that he was arrested on 27.06.2007 around 11.30 a.m. while he was on his way to attend a funeral in the Neluketiya area and that at the time he was arrested the,1st respondent had assaulted him. The petitioner accordingly alleged that due to the aforementioned action his fundamental rights guaranteed in terms of Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Constitution had been infringed for which this Court had granted leave to proceed. Although leave to proceed was granted on Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the…
Read MoreTag: law
D.G. Wijotmanna vs. Diyakeliyawela and other police officers S.C. F.R. No: 138/2007
It has been alleged by the petitioner that on or about 04. 02 .2007 around 4.30 p.m. he had boarded a bus from Katugasthota town to return to his business place. As there was a person standing on the upper stand of the foot-board of the bus, he had to request that person to move inside, in order to get inside the bus. This having led to an exchange of words between two of them, the said person had kicked the petitioner hard resulting the petitioner losing his balance requiring…
Read Moreදිනේශ් තරින්ද වදහිංසා නඩුව 2303/2007
2004.06.01 හා 2004.06.03 වන දින අතර කාලය තුල දී මොහුට චූදිත හර්ෂණ තිලංග ගුණසිංහ යන අය තොරතුරු දැනගැනීමට බියගන්වා වද දුන් බැවින් 1994 අංක 22 දරණ සම්මුතියේ වගන්ති අනුව මොහු වරදක් සිදුකර ඇත. ඒ අනුව මෙම දිනේශ් තරින්ද යන යන අයව අත්තඩංගුවට ගෙන මාංචු දමා විනාඩි 45ක් පමණ පහර දී ඇත. ඒ අවස්තාවේ දී ඔහුට ක්‍රිකට් පොලු වලින්ද පහර දී ඇත. එමෙන්ම ඔහුට පා පහරවල් ද එල්ල කර ඇතම් මෙම පහර දීම් නිසා ඔහුගේ අත කැඩුණු බව ද පවසයි. නමුත් මෙම චෝදනා සියල්ලෙහිම සාක්ෂි සලකා බැලීමේ දී සාධාරණ සැකයෙන් ඔබ්බට…
Read MoreAmarasinghe Arachchige Mangalasiri Amarasinghe, vs P.M. Seneviratne, Inspector of Police,Anil Priyantha, Headquarters Inspector, S.C. (F/R) No. 264/2006
The Petitioner is an Anesthetist, attached to the Base Hospital Dambulla and was also the Chief Organizer of the United National Party for Dodangaslanda. The 1st Respondent is an Inspector of Police of the Kurunegala Police Station. The 2nd Respondent is the Head Quarters Inspector of the Kurunegala Police Station. The Petitioner alleges that he was assaulted by the 1st Respondent inside the Kurunegala Police Station premises on 21.06.2006 and as such the Petitioner’s Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 11 of the Constitution have been infringed. The primary issue to…
Read MoreRoshan Mahesh Ukwatta, vs Sub Inspector Marasinghe, Officer in Charge,Sagara Liyanage, Inspector of Police,The Inspector General of Police, Police Headquarters, SC. FR Application No. 252/2006
When the case was mentioned in open Court on 09-11-2006 the 1st and 2nd respondents were absent and unrepresented and the State Counsel who represented the 4th Respondent ( Hon. the Attorney-General) had informed Court that the Attorney General was not appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents. Perusal of the docket reveals that on 25th August 2008 the Attorney-General had intimated to Court that on investigation reports filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents the Petitioner would be discharged in the criminal proceedings. However the petitioner elected to proceed…
Read MoreManoj Talis vs Inspector Hiriyadeniya and others SC(FR) No. 430/2005
The Petitioner complains that the 1st to 6th Respondents came to his house on 24.09.2005 around 9.15. p.m. and arrested the Petitioner. Thereafter the Petitioner was taken to Gokarella Police Station. The Petitioner complains that the 3rd Respondent slapped him, the 2nd Respondent gave a blow to his ear and the 1st Respondent hit him on his face inside the Police Station. This assaultaccording to the has taken place in a room of the Police Station. The 1st,2nd,3th,5th and 6th Respondents are directed to pay the said compensation to the…
Read MoreSAMARAKOON AND OTHERS VS UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND OTHERS | 2005 1SLR 119
Fundamental Rights – Petitioners who qualified to join Medical Faculty from Kandy District according to policy declared in Hand Book excluded – Legitimate expectations – Article 12(1) of the Constitution. According to the Hand Book for the academic year 2000/2001 published by the University Grants Commission (UGC) it was declared that 900 places will be available for intake of students to medical faculties of all the Universities in this country. Out of this number and as per the marking scheme, 54 places had to be allocated to the Kandy District.…
Read MoreLama Hewage Lal DECEASED 1. Wewalage Rani Fernando (wife of the deceased) 2. Lama Hewage Janaka, 3. Lama Hewage Sampath 4. Lama Hewage Malsha Nadeeshani (Minor children of the deceased, appearing through their mother) Wewalage Rani Fernando (Guardian an-Litem) All of No. 90/1, Medawatte, Seeduwa South, Seeduwa PETITIONERS vs. 1. Officer – in – Charge, Minor Offences, Seeduwa Police Station, Seeduwa. 2. Officer – in –Charge, Police Station, Seeduwa. 3. Ratnayake, Officer – in – Charge, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 4. The Chief Jailer, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 5. Superintendent of Prison, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 6. Inspector of General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Colombo-1 7. Commissioner General of Prison, |
This is an application filed by the wife and three minor children of one Lama Hewage Lal who was arrested by the officials of the Seeduwa Police Station. Subsequently he had died whilst in the custody of the Negombo Prison Officials. The Petitioners alleged that the said Lama Hewage Lal (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) died as a result of torture while in detention and therefore at a time when he was deprived of his personal liberty. They have prayed for a declaration that the deceased’s fundamental rights guaranteed…
Read MoreSRI THAMINDA, DHARSHANE AND MAHALEKAM v INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND OTHERS SC FR 463/464/465/03
The petitioners allege violations of Articles, 11 and 13(1) by certain officers. They complain that they were arrested without justification and were brutally assaulted, and further contend that, they were subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in violation of Article 11. The respondents contended that the petitioners were under the influence of liquor and when the 3rd petitioner was requested to move his three wheeler away, the petitioners had attacked the respondents and the Police Constable who had sustained injuries had to be hospitalised,…
Read MoreADHIKARY AND ANOTHER v AMARASINGHE AND OTHERS | 2003 1SLR 270
The 1 st petitioner an attorney-at-law was proceeding in his car from Nawala to the Bandaranaike International Conference Hall (BMICH) with his wife the 2nd petitioner and his child and the mother to attend an exhibition. At Narahenpita there was traffic block. When the vehicles started moving the 1st and 2nd respondents came up to petitioner’s car and pulled the petitioner out and abused him and stopped him. When the 2nd petitioner intervened they abused her also and slapped her. When the 1st petitioner disclosed that he was an attorney-at-law…
Read More