On 20.02.1997 the Post Master, Central Post Office, Kataragama, made a complaint to the Kataragama Police regarding a loss of monies from the Post Office safe. The petitioner was a messenger attached to that Post Office; but there was no complaint against the petitioner. However, on the same day the 2nd respondent, an Inspector of Police (since dead), arrested the petitioner and took him to the police station. The 2nd respondent questioned the petitioner about the “theft”, slapped him on the left ear and knocked his head on a wall.…
Read MoreCategory: Supreme court
SUBASINGHE v. POLICE CONSTABLE SANDUN AND OTHERS S.C. (SPECIAL) NO. 235/96
On 26.11.1996 the petitioner made a complaint to the 3rd respondent (OIC, Dankotuwa Police) regarding a commercial transaction. On the evening of that day, the 1st respondent police constable met the petitioner at the Dankotuwa Public Market and threatened to teach him a “good lesson”. The next day, the 1st respondent and another police officer (the 2nd respondent) arrested the petitioner at the Dankotuwa Public Market and took him to the police station. Thereafter the 1st respondent assaulted the petitioner with hands, kicked him and also beat him with a…
Read MoreKARUNADASA v. UNIQUE GEM STONES LTD., AND OTHERS| 1997 1SLR 256
The Commissioner of Labour (2nd respondent) acting on the recommendation of an Assistant Commissioner (3rd respondent) to whom he had delegated the power to hold an inquiry, as permitted by Section 11 of the Termination of Employment of Workmen (Special Provisions) Act No. 45 of 1971, held that the termination of services of the appellant workman was contrary to Section 2(1) of the Act and ordered his reinstatement with back wages. The 2nd respondent failed to give reasons for his decision, though requested by the 1st respondent employer. No material…
Read MoreCHANDRASENA V. KULATUNGA AND OTHERS |1996 2SLR 326
The Petitioner, a trained teacher ‘complained that he was transferred from Puttalam Regional Education Office to the Nikaweratiya Regional Education Office, in the middle of the year, with only 6 days notice, ‘without valid reasons or cause and in an arbitrary, malicious and capricious manner, subjecting him to selective hostile discrimination*. The Petitioner averred that no other teacher in North – Western Provincial Council had been transferred in this manner. The 3rd Respondent (North – Western Provincial Director of Education) claimed that the transfer was on disciplinary grounds, with the…
Read MorePRIYANGANI V. NANAYAKKARA AND OTHERS | 1996 1SLR 399
Petitioner, a Primary school teacher completed a five year period at a school classified as a difficult school and applied for and obtained a transfer to a school close to her husband’s home in February 1995. On 29.06.95 she received a letter dated 13.06.95 issued by the 2nd Respondent the Director of Education of the Puttalam Zone of the North Western Province (NWP) transferring her back to the old difficult school with immediate effect. Also no travelling expenses were to be paid. Transfers within the NWP were governed by a…
Read MoreABEYWICKREMA v. GUNARATNA AND THREE OTHERS S.C. SPL 93/96.
The petitioner who is a three wheeler driver has taken a passenger on hire; and after arriving at the Police Station with the passenger as requested by him, he was assaulted by the Police taken into custody and produced before the A.J.M.O. According to the petitioner, on 7th July 1996 he has taken a passenger to Ragama on hire and had returned with the said passenger around 7 p.m. The passenger had gone into his place of lodging to bring the money to pay the hire due to the petitioner…
Read MoreGUNARATNE AND OTHERS V. CEYLON PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND OTHERS | 1996 2SLR 315
For many years before 1994 the 1st Petitioner had – as an individual – a Dealership Agreement together with the requisite authority under section 5 E of the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation Act, No. 28 of 1961 as amended (by Act No. 5 of 1963) for running a filling station for the sale, supply and distribution of petroleum. The same filling station was taken over by the petitioners in partnership on a Dealership Agreement signed by the Petitioners on 23.3.94 and by 1st Respondent on 26.10.94 and the petitioners were granted…
Read MoreDISSANAYAKE, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW ON BEHALF OF K. M. LAL v. SUJEEWA, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEETIYAGODA POLICE STATION AND OTHERS S.C. APPLICATION NO. 524/96
At the time this application was filed the victim Lai was unconscious. Subsequently he tendered an affidavit. It was alleged that close to midnight on 02. 06. 1996 when he was sleeping in his house, the 1st respondent and other police officers arrived and arrested him. He was taken to the Meetiyagoda Police station. In the early hours 03. 06. 1996 the 1st respondent assaulted him with hands and feet and a club when he lost consciousness. Later that day the police admitted the victim to Batapola hospital. As per…
Read MoreRIFAIDEEN v. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAYALATH, WELLAWATTE POLICE STATION AND OTHERS SC (SPL) NO. 71/96
The petitioner who was 59 years old, was a “broker* by profession. He has averred that on 27.05.1996, the 1st respondent with some other police officers attached to the Police Station, Wellawatte, took him into custody while he was travelling from Panadura to Colombo. The petitioner alleges that he was taken to the Police Station and was assaulted by the 1st respondent at the instigation of the 2nd respondent. The allegation is that the petitioner was assaulted with sand filled S-lon pipes and he thereby sustained injuries to his head,…
Read MorePRIYANKARA v. PC SISIRA KUMARA, POLICE STATION, PUTTALAM AND OTHERS SC APPLICATION NO 214/96 (SPL.)
The petitioner was travelling in a Puttalam bound bus when a passenger boarded the bus with a lighted cigarette. When the conductor of the bus attempted to stop the smoking, the passenger retaliated by using obscene language. At that stage the petitioner intervened. Then also the passenger retaliated by using obscene language. When the bus reached the Puttalam bus stand the passenger challenged the petitioner. The petitioner attempted to escape but the passenger assaulted the petitioner repeatedly. Thereafter, the petitioner visited the Puttalam Police Station and complained to the OIC,…
Read More